In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
That is good to know, thank you. I thought he might be telling me that to make the house appear more attractive to purchase!
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Restoration is far less predictable, in terms of cost, than replacement; and the dreaded imprevisti (unanticipated works) can accumulate horribly. The things that had the biggest impact on our budget were opening new apertures for doors, cuttiing out bedrock to lower the floor level and raising the gable wall to accommodate the new roof: the computometrico was very specific about the cost of the roof but did not anticipate the structural alteration which had to precede it. We are delighted with the result, though, having retained the original thickness of the walls (1.5 metres in places) and the vaulted ceiling. I would certainly choose renovation over rebuild again- you just need to incorporate a big contingency fund into your budget. For what it's worth, I allowed for an extra 25% and ended up using most of it.
Yes! (Oh, can't get away with so few words...)
There is usually very little difference in cost between building new and restoring something pretty grotty, and €1200 a sq m is a reasonably middle ground building price for either choice. However, if the house has any aspirations to 'character', you will be talked out of retaining much of this if you go the full rebuild route - but on the other hand you will end up (for the same money) with a property with full guarantees, and much more saleable to Italians.