In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
[LEFT]Hi george, I think that the seven days one can be used for the not-so-serious offenders (banning someone for a month is basically equivalent to kicking them out of the forum and some people despite all their shortcomings we do want coming back)
formal notices should be private because we might have gotten the wrong end of the stick so its good to give people a chance to reply before publicly demeaning them.
what do the others think?[/LEFT]
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Ohh, I see where your coming from, but we gotta debate a bit, gives us something on the table, then you put the rules in :-))
There's a wrong end to a stick ?????? Phew.....
Seriously, it's good to have a set of rules especially for newbies, I suppose that when you embark on something like the site, you have to make your projections to use and are more involved in actually getting the thing uo and running rather than concentrating on the minutiae (I was off the day they spelled that one) then catch up a couple of years down the line.
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
I have nothing to add to the rules and regs above - it all makes sense.
One thing I would like to suggest is that we make it compulsory on registration that people provide an ISP bonded email address (i.e. not a web based email address). On another forum I used to visit they found that this greatly reduced the incidence of 'trolling' on their forum.
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Hello,
All sounds fairly straightforward to me. Agree on the confidentiality bit for 1st & 2nd offences - though I wouldn't mind 'naming & shaming' anyone who gets kicked off the site and explaining why! I guess this would probably happen very rarely anyway...
I'm sure you'll get a couple of sarcastic replies to the rules but at least it clarifies the whole issue.
Sano - not sure what you mean by "...ISP bonded email address (i.e. not a web based email address)." I take it you mean emails related to someone's company or personal website and not emails from the likes of providers like 'hotmail' (as I'm on one... :))?
Bring it on Ronald!!
:eek:
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
hi,
sano: i see where you are coming from with the ISP e-mail but probably that would exclude too many people. These days a lot of people will just check the forum from an internet cafe.
georgeS & iona: how about follow George's suggestion then and replace the second offense punishment with a public naming and shaming
will give marc and charles a chance to reply and then will go ahead with posting.
thanks everyone!
ronald
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
[QUOTE=ronald].....
georgeS & iona: how about follow George's suggestion then and replace the second offense punishment with a public naming and shaming ....
ronald[/QUOTE]
Ronald,
We'd have to ensure that it's done in a very neutral manner. Don't want to jeopardise losing valued members too if they get into a strop over someone's 'mistreatment' (as some might perceive it...)...
Stephanie
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
I am in a bit of a dilemma over public admonishment too, after raising it, although if it was done, softly, you know "George, we have spoken privately about your lapses into ............., a further instance will (is likely to ) result in a suspension from the forum, I am sure we would all wish to avoid this course of action" sort of thing.
Also, in the rules, there is a bracketed comment about being more lenient, as a T.U. official, I would have used that against an employer at every instance just to be awkward, it would mean that you leave yourself open to justifying EVERY decision you make. Leaving the statement out would not leave you open to anything, and, would still allow leniency in the more moderate cases.
Now, on a slightly more humerous note, are we going to run a sweepstake on the first member to replace their keyboard due to overuse of the * button :D
I know the rule must stay in it makes eminent sense, I am really interested in seeing if the swearing goes up as a result, thinking about it, the comments about the rules themselves will probably cause a couple of key boards to melt down ;) :eek:
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
[LEFT]
Ronald...
Rules seem OK to me. I would add something about advertising. As you know some members have, in the past, directly promoted their activities at every opportunity. I think having links with signatures is sufficient. It is up to a member whether they want to make contact or visit a web site.
Charles
[/LEFT]
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Hi Charles, advertising will get a whole section of its own! Essentially what is already posted in the forums.
All the best,
Ronald
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Hi Ronald,
I agree 100% with the rules, but the problem is that the people who would benefit most from reading the rules are the least likely to plough diligently through them.
Mind if I submit a condensed version?.....
[indent]
Please, don't post angry or offensive material, or material that could be interpreted that way. People of all ages and abilities hang out on the Italy Mag Forums, so please remember this when posting.
Objectionable material will be edited by the moderators and may result in your being banned from the Forum. By this we mean unlawful, harassing, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, or racially offensive writing.
Please be patient. Remember when you were a newbie, and try to be kind. The Italy Magazine Forums is an incredibly friendly place, so please help to keep it that way.
Please don't post your entry more than once, even if it's in different areas of the Forum.
Be aware of the implications of including email addresses on the Forum, particularly that their use may help others to 'spam' the addresee. Disclose your own email address if you want, but please, don't state those of other people.
Only link to other web sites if they are relevant to the topic, decent, and informative. Links to business web sites are acceptable, as long as they are not a sneaky attempt at advertising.
If you fail to abide by these rules, our moderators may edit your post, delete it, suspend you or ban you altogether, depending on how serious your offense was.
[/indent]
Any thoughts?
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
i think you are right mark.
i will post your short version (thanks for taking the time to edit the longer one!) throughout all the forums and keep the longer version (and associated penalities) under FAQ.
Many thanks to all,
Ronald
In reply to A newbie all over again! by Annec
Absolutely agree with Charles about advertising, we must have something up there. We have a lot of very loyal advertisers who pay good money to go on the site and I know some of them get very fed up with those who use the forum to tout themselves or their products and don't pay for it!
I would suggest that you remove the second offence punishment, seven days is a very short suspnsion , either replace it with a formal, and public notice, or replace seven days with the month, and then onto permanent ban, there should be very few posters who move past the first stage in any event, and it is better, in my view to be rid of persistant offenders as quickly as possible.